To appeal to consumers, enterprises such as Amazon and Zoom have been emphasizing their corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives through comprehensive reports.
These reports allow businesses to showcase their initiatives benefiting employees, customers, communities, and the environment—highlighting objectives beyond profit generation. Research indicates that CSR disclosures are linked to increased sales.
As a marketing professor, this correlation prompted a compelling question: Are the additional sales driven by CSR disclosures coming from new customers, or are they simply boosting purchases from the existing customer base?
In a recent investigation involving the examination of numerous Chinese companies, a collaborator and I aimed to address this inquiry. Our results indicated that CSR disclosures lessen a company’s dependence on its current clientele by 2.1%.
This result is promising for businesses—it indicates that these additional sales are being driven by new customers who are positively influenced by the company’s CSR activities.
However, the results also revealed challenges.
In order to boost sales, businesses frequently find it necessary to broaden their supply acquisition. This leads to the following inquiry: Do CSR disclosures aid companies in gaining new suppliers?
To our surprise, we discovered the contrary. Businesses releasing CSR reports seemed to discourage potential suppliers. This may stem from the fact that suppliers frequently bear extra expenses when a business focuses on social responsibility.
Relying heavily on suppliers can become costly for businesses. When suppliers recognize that a company depends on them, they are more likely to demand cash payments instead of extending credit. This reduction in credit availability can strain a company’s cash flow, leaving fewer resources for investment.
Thus, while CSR disclosures can attract customers, they may alienate suppliers—posing a potential downside.
Although earlier studies have shown that CSR disclosures have the potential to increase sales, it was not evident if these sales came from new or current customers. Our research offers insights that can assist in business decision-making.
This insight is also relevant to policymakers, regulators, and advocates for corporate responsibility, who are debating whether CSR reporting should become mandatory.
Although the U.S. does not obligate businesses to publish CSR reports, other countries, including China, do. Starting in 2009, every publicly traded company in China has been required to file yearly CSR reports, which laid the groundwork for our research.
Interestingly, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has thought about the possibility of mandating CSR disclosure. Until such regulations are established, numerous American firms will probably keep issuing these reports on their own initiative.
Considering these advancements, the demand for empirical data regarding the advantages and expenses of CSR reporting is more crucial than ever.
Future Directions
Growing concerns about extreme weather events and their associated human impacts have piqued my interest in environmental responsibility. I am currently working on two research projects in this area.
First, I am examining corporations’ public statements to evaluate their environmental risks and the steps they’ve implemented to address these issues. Second, I am exploring how CEO motivations impact corporate environmental statements, initiatives, and expenditures—or the absence of such measures.
