In an expansive warehouse in eastern Thailand, near a major highway, government inspector Thitipas Choddaechachainun meticulously examines piles of discarded electronics—circuit boards, scrap metal, and aging computer accessories. Each week, she and her team from the Thai Ministry of Industry investigate unauthorized facilities handling electronic waste, collecting samples for laboratory testing and regulatory enforcement.
Choddaechachainun leads a dedicated team that is concentrated on addressing the country’s rising problem with electronic waste, commonly referred to as e-waste. Despite frequent inspections and actions against these illegal operations—numerous of which are hidden in distant locations to avoid detection—the scale of the problem continues to expand.
Thailand is dealing with the consequences of shifts in global electronic waste allocation. Previously, countries like China handled the majority of digital discards from wealthier nations, particularly the United States and European Union members. This changed in 2018 when China implemented a ban on e-waste imports, prompting exporters to seek alternative locations in Southeast Asia, with Thailand being among the selected ones.
Thailand applied its own prohibition on the importation of e-waste in 2020. However, the outcomes have been anything but positive. As reported by Earth Thailand, a nonprofit dedicated to environmental advocacy, the volume of e-waste brought into the country has surged from about 3,000 tons each year prior to the Chinese restriction to nearly 60,000 tons currently.
This influx is partly fueled by high turnover rates in electronic devices among Western consumers. Frequent upgrades to smartphones, laptops, and other electronic goods—combined with widespread ownership of large household appliances—generate substantial waste. Although international regulations aim to prevent the export of hazardous waste to developing nations, loopholes remain. For example, shipments are often misdeclared as used electronics meant for resale, only to be dismantled and smelted upon arrival.
The recycling process itself poses significant environmental risks. Once on Thai soil, the e-waste is crushed and smelted to extract valuable raw materials like copper and gold. While profitable, this method of recovery emits dangerous substances such as mercury and lead, and contaminates the air, soil, and water.
Thai authorities are of the opinion that most of the gathered metals are sent to China, resulting in environmental and social impacts.
Thai Industry Minister Akanat Promphan speaks out regarding the damage these operations inflict. He stresses that the unlawful recycling sector fails to benefit the country’s economy and instead causes harm to local environments and populations. His department has initiated a more intensive effort to close down illegal activities and remove foreign-owned facilities engaged in unlawful practices.
“Thailand is being used as a dumping ground,” Promphan says. “We are dealing with an international waste processing operation that brings no benefit to our country but leaves a trail of destruction.”
The negative impact extends to everyday citizens like Seng Wongsena, a 57-year-old farmer in eastern Thailand. He claims that polluted runoff from a nearby smelting facility has hurt his cassava yield, and the stench of burning waste disrupts his sleep. Local activists maintain the smelter is operating illegally and are pressing authorities to intervene.
On an international level, the consequences are alarming. According to the United Nations, more than 60 million tonnes of electronic waste are created worldwide annually—twice the amount documented 15 years prior. Projections indicate that this number could increase by more than 30% before the decade concludes.
Despite the concerning rise, merely around 20% of worldwide electronic waste is processed through responsible and eco-friendly methods. The remainder is discarded in landfills or handled under hazardous conditions, frequently in nations with inadequate regulatory control.
Several countries have implemented laws concerning extended producer responsibility, which make producers responsible for the disposal of their products at the end of their life cycles. Firms like Apple, Samsung, and Dell are being encouraged to create mechanisms for taking back and recycling their products.
Thailand is considering a similar legislative framework, aiming to strengthen local enforcement and reduce illegal activities related to e-waste handling. Promphan is optimistic about its future implementation.
“I’m hopeful that we will pass this new law soon—either by the end of this year or early next year,” he says. “We need comprehensive action to eliminate this illicit industry and protect our people and environment.”
As Thailand moves forward with legal reform and enhances regulation, their actions reflect a smaller aspect of a more extensive issue. Managing electronic waste necessitates worldwide collaboration, clear supply networks, and teamwork between consumers and producers. Without major transformation, the ecological impact of our technological era might surpass its advantages.
